Four experts on Native American law, including three Oklahoma judges, will explore the impact of the landmark Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma at a program Thursday, October 7, hosted by the American Bar Association Judicial Division.
The program, titled “Final Notice-Past Due: The Challenges and Cost of Justice in the Wake of McGirt v. Oklahoma,” will start at 1 p.m. It is co-sponsored by the National Conference of Specialized Court Judges and the ABA Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice.
Jimcy McGirt, a Seminole, was convicted in an Oklahoma state court of violent sex crimes occurring on Muscogee (Creek) Nation lands. McGirt argued that under 19th century treaties, he could only be prosecuted in a tribal or federal court because Congress never disestablished reservation boundaries that encompass much of eastern Oklahoma. In July 2020, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Muscogee (Creek) Nation's treaty reservation boundaries and held that the state did not have criminal jurisdiction over McGirt.
Panelists at the ABA program will discuss how the ruling has created jurisdictional, logistical and funding challenges for criminal prosecutions on tribal lands in Oklahoma and, perhaps, elsewhere. They also will explore the need to clarify what laws and regulations apply to lands located inside reservation boundaries.
Panelists will include:
• Judge T. Luke Barteaux of the Cherokee Nation District Court in Oklahoma
• Judge Gregory H. Bigler of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation District Court in Oklahoma
• Judge Stacy Leeds of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation District Court in Oklahoma and currently a law professor at Arizona State University
The 90-minute program will be moderated by Judge Lisa Atkinson, a tribal court judge and attorney based in Keaau, Hawaii.
To register for the program, visit www.americanbar.org/groups/judicial.
- Posted September 29, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
ABA program to explore impact of McGirt case on Native American lands
headlines Oakland County
- Reading reenactment
- Supreme Court overturns precedent on how to determine a child's domicile when parents are divorced
- Nessel reissues government imposter scams consumer alert following reports
- Formal Opinion 524: Government lawyers’ obligations when knowing of a public official’s intended or ongoing violation of law
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to address the opioid crisis, support public health
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says




