- Posted January 25, 2022
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Washtenaw County jury sides with state in MDOC employment lawsuit
A unanimous jury has sided with the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) in Washtenaw County Circuit Court involving staff at the Women's Huron Valley (WHV) Correctional Facility, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced last Friday.
In 2009, MDOC designated specific positions at the state's women's prison that could only be filled by female officers. Those are referred to as bona fide occupational (BFOQ) positions. The move was done for the protection of prisoners and staff given officers in these positions would conduct pat-down searches of female prisoners, potentially observe female prisoners in a state of undress, and/or interact with female prisoners in isolated, one-on-one circumstances.
Current and former male officers at the women's prison led by plaintiff Tom Nowacki in a suit first filed in 2011 claimed the positions discriminated against them based on their gender and led to being denied overtime opportunities. In the case, they sought millions of dollars of taxpayer money in damages they felt they were owed.
Last Friday, following a trial lasting more than a week before Washtenaw County Circuit Court Judge Archie Brown, the jury unanimously found that the BFOQ positions were justified to accomplish the central mission of the MDOC at WHV of protecting the female prisoners.
"There is a clear difference between policies that ensure safety and policies that foment discrimination. MDOC's approach to staffing the Women's Huron Valley Correction Facility is an example of a reasonable policy that best keeps prisoners and staff safe," Nessel said. "I appreciate the jury's thorough consideration of this serious matter."
"This is great news for the department, and we are beyond pleased to see the jury unanimously ruled in our favor," MDOC Director Heidi Washington said. "We have policies in place to keep prisoners and staff safe and we are so grateful this jury understood that, and that the actions we took were reasonable and justified."
Published: Tue, Jan 25, 2022
headlines Oakland County
- Reading reenactment
- Supreme Court overturns precedent on how to determine a child's domicile when parents are divorced
- Nessel reissues government imposter scams consumer alert following reports
- Formal Opinion 524: Government lawyers’ obligations when knowing of a public official’s intended or ongoing violation of law
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to address the opioid crisis, support public health
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says




