By Ed White
Associated Press
A police department in Michigan's Upper Peninsula has been ordered to release its full policy on the use of force after failing to convince the state appeals court that portions should be concealed from the public.
The court noted that Amy Hjerstedt's request in Sault Ste. Marie followed the killing of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis in 2020.
"Michigan has a strong public policy favoring public access to government information," Judge Sima Patel said Tuesday in a 3-0 opinion.
"Although certain information may be exempt from disclosure, the statutory exemptions are not intended to shield public bodies from the transparency that FOIA was designed to foster," Patel said, referring to Michigan's public records law.
Sault Ste. Marie, population 13,400, gave Hjerstedt a heavily redacted copy of its policy. The redactions centered on use-of-force considerations and other strategies.
"This has been an issue throughout the state, throughout the nation," Hjerstedt's attorney, Mark Dobias, told the appeals court on Jan. 10. "If people don't know, how can they discuss how to improve use of force?"
Police Chief Wesley Bierling said releasing the information could affect the safety of officers and the general public. A Chippewa County judge subsequently ruled in favor of the city.
Exemptions in Michigan's public records law "are designed to keep the public partially in the dark when it's appropriate to do so," Karen Beach, an attorney for Sault Ste. Marie, told the appeals court.
But not in this case, the court said this week, pointing out that other police departments have posted their force policies online.
"The city could not produce any particularized evidence that the availability of these policies has resulted in endangerment of the life or safety of law enforcement officers, their families or the general public," Patel wrote, joined by judges Stephen Borrello and Douglas Shapiro.
The court sent the case back to Judge James Lambros to release the force policy, award attorney fees to Hjerstedt and determine whether Sault Ste. Marie should pay $1,000 in punitive damages.
- Posted February 23, 2023
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court says Michigan city can't conceal police force policy
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- ABA amicus brief supports noncitizens’ right to a bond hearing when detention becomes ‘unreasonably prolonged’
- Nessel secures full victory in lawsuit challenging administration’s attack on fair housing protections
- Whitmer announces new automotive jobs, investment in Oakland County
- AG pushes federal government to strengthen rules to combat illegal robocalls
headlines National
- ABA Legal Ed council repeals DEI standard
- Is Perry Mason TV’s most effective lawyer? New study names top 5
- Lawyer who cited paraphrasing as direct quotes in 2nd Circuit brief says AI played a role
- After jury deadlock and mistrial, Lindsay Clancy could face second trial
- Murder, Corruption and RICO in Georgia: Fateful meeting I didn’t want to attend led to courtroom win
- Bad Bunny, Justin Bieber among musical stars facing copyright suit for using reggaeton’s signature beat




