Supreme Court will hear arguments on constitutionality of pension tax

The Michigan Supreme Court, in an Order (143157) dated June 15, 2011, has agreed to hear oral argument on the request by Governor Rick Snyder concerning the “constitutionality of the reduction or elimination of tax exemption for pension incomes...”

The text of the Order follows:

IN RE REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION REGARDING CONSTITUTIONALITY OF 2011 PA 38      SC:13157

On order of the Court, the request by the Governor for an advisory opinion on the constitutionality of the reduction or elimination of tax exemption for pension incomes contained in 2011 PA 38 is considered, and it is GRANTED. We direct that oral argument on the following questions be heard on Wednesday, September 7, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The questions submitted are: (1) whether reducing or eliminating the statutory exemption for public-pension incomes as described in MCL 206.30, as amended, impairs accrued financial benefits of a “pension plan [or] retirement system of the state [or] its political subdivisions” under Const 1963, art 9, § 24; (2) whether reducing or eliminating the statutory tax exemption for pension incomes, as described in MCL 206.30, as amended, impairs a contract obligation in violation of Const 1963, art 1, § 10 or the US Const, art I, § 10(1); (3) whether determining eligibility for income-tax exemptions on the basis of total household resources, or age and total household resources, as described in MCL 206.30(7) and (9), as amended, creates a graduated income tax in violation of Const 1963, art 9, § 7; and (4) whether determining eligibility for income-tax exemptions on the basis of date of birth, as described in MCL 206.30(9), as amended, violates equal protection of the law under Const 1963, art 1, § 2 or the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The Attorney General is respectfully requested to submit within 56 days of the date of this order separate briefs arguing that the reduction or elimination of tax exemption for pension incomes contained in 2011 PA 38 and the determination of eligibility of income tax exemptions for pensions on the basis of age are and are not constitutional under the Michigan and United States Constitutions.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the questions presented in this matter may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae on either
or both sides of the submitted questions.

––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available