- Posted April 17, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court hears dispute over First Amendment
By Ed White
Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) - Michigan courts can have no role in admission decisions at faith-based schools, a lawyer told the state Supreme Court last Thursday in a case that tests whether a family can sue a Roman Catholic school over their daughter's rejection.
Notre Dame Preparatory School insists federal and state legal precedent protects religious schools under the First Amendment. But a lawyer for a girl who was rejected in 2014 told justices that the lawsuit should be evaluated purely as a case of illegal discrimination.
"It's the kind of case that can be decided without straying into ecclesiastical religious doctrine," Nicholas Roumel said.
Notre Dame Prep in Pontiac told the girl that she wouldn't be admitted to ninth grade because of poor grades. The girl was later diagnosed with dyslexia and attention-deficit disorder. The school denied any discrimination based on her learning disability.
Attorney James Walsh, who represents the school and its sponsor, the Marist Fathers of Detroit, said courts can't tell a church how to fill its pews or decide who goes to a religious school.
"The pastor, principal - whoever makes the decision - can say, 'We will not be able to effectively convey our faith to this student.' ... Any inquiry by a court about why a student is or isn't accepted in a Catholic school would cause entanglement by a court in religion," Walsh said.
There's no guarantee that the Michigan Supreme Court will take any action. Justices could drop the case and let a 2015 appeals court decision stand in favor of Notre Dame Prep.
Published: Mon, Apr 17, 2017
headlines Oakland County
headlines National
- A dozen ways that bar licensure could change in 2026
- DOJ sues state officials over laws protecting immigrants at courthouses
- Practical guidance for ethically changing law firms
- ‘Christmas Lawyer’ uses settlement with homeowners association on more holiday decorations
- Building the case for trial in the last 60 days
- Legal tech GCs, chief legal officers reflect on 2025, share vision for 2026




