WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to decide whether a lawsuit can go forward in which a group of Muslim residents of California allege the FBI targeted them for surveillance because of their religion.
It's the second case the court has accepted for the fall involving a government claim of "state secrets," the idea that the government can block the release of information it claims would harm national security if disclosed.
As is usual, the court didn't comment Monday beyond saying it will take the case, which is expected to be heard after the court takes its summer recess and begins hearing arguments again in October.
In the other state secrets case the justices have accepted they'll decide whether a Palestinian man captured after the Sept. 11 attacks and detained at the prison on the U.S. base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, can get access to information the government classifies as state secrets.
The case the court accepted Monday involves three Muslim residents of Southern California who say that from 2006 to 2007 the FBI paid a confidential informant to covertly gather information about Muslims in Orange County, California, based solely on their religion.
A district court dismissed the case after the federal government invoked the state secrets privilege. The court agreed that continuing the case would "greatly risk disclosure of secret information." But an appeals court reversed the decision.
- Posted June 09, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court agrees to hear 2nd 'state secrets' case
headlines Oakland County
- Holiday cheer
- Oakland County launches expanded Registered Apprenticeship Guide highlighting 72 career pathways
- American Revolution traveling exhibit featured at library
- 2026 ABA Alexander Awards to honor leaders expanding pathways to legal education
- New state report examines how work impacts mental and physical health
headlines National
- A dozen ways that bar licensure could change in 2026
- DOJ sues state officials over laws protecting immigrants at courthouses
- Practical guidance for ethically changing law firms
- ‘Christmas Lawyer’ uses settlement with homeowners association on more holiday decorations
- Building the case for trial in the last 60 days
- Legal tech GCs, chief legal officers reflect on 2025, share vision for 2026




