- Posted March 27, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
U.S. court: Judges can rule on passport law
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court said Monday that the federal courts are eminently capable of judging a law that would allow Jerusalem-born Americans to list Israel as their birthplace on their U.S. passport.
The justices, in an 8-1 judgment, overturned a lower court ruling that said the judiciary could not get involved in a political fight mixing Middle Eastern politics with a dispute between Congress and the president.
"The courts are fully capable of determining whether this statute may be given effect, or instead must be struck down in light of authority conferred on the executive by the Constitution," said Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the majority opinion.
But because the lower courts never actually ruled on the merits of the law giving Americans born in Jerusalem the right to have Israel listed as their birthplace -- only that judges should not get involved -- Roberts said the high court did not have enough facts to determine the law's constitutionality.
"Ours is a court of final review and not first view," said Roberts, who sent the case back down to the lower courts for rehearing.
The parents of Jerusalem-born Menachem Zivotofsky sued the State Department after it wouldn't issue the boy a passport showing he was born in Israel. The United States has refused to recognize any nation's sovereignty over Jerusalem since Israel's creation in 1948.
Justice Stephen Breyer was the only dissenter on the court, saying there is a "serious risk" that judicial "intervention will bring about 'embarrassment.'"
Published: Tue, Mar 27, 2012
headlines Detroit
headlines National
- More lawyers—and clients—want to learn about sustainable development practices
- Top artificial intelligence insurance tips for lawyers
- Lawyer charged with illegally transmitting Michigan data after 2020 election
- Viral video shows former Rikers Island inmate as she learns she passed bar exam on first try
- How Sullivan & Cromwell is scrutinizing potential new hires after campus protests
- No separate hearing required when police seize cars loaned to drivers accused of drug crimes, SCOTUS rules