- Posted May 03, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Nebraska Justice Dept.: Dismiss suit over contraception
By Grant Schulte
Associated Press
LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- The U.S. Justice Department is asking a judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by several states that challenges a new federal health care rule that requires contraception coverage for employees of church-affiliated hospitals, schools and outreach programs.
Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, who is leading the suit, scoffed at the request Tuesday, noting that the department has pushed the rule's enforcement deadline to next year -- after the November elections -- and hasn't detailed how it plans in the meantime to address religious groups' concerns.
"Regardless of the continuous promises of change offered by this administration, the results are nothing more than bait and switch," the Republican, who is running for U.S. Senate, said.
Department lawyers argued for the lawsuit's dismissal in court papers filed late Monday, noting that they have agreed not to enforce the rule until August 2013 and have promised to work with religious groups.
The lawsuit alleges that the new rule violates the First Amendment rights of groups that object to the use of contraceptives.
It was filed in U.S. District Court of Nebraska by Bruning and his fellow GOP attorneys general from Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas. Three Nebraska-based groups -- Catholic Social Services, Pius X Catholic High School and the Catholic Mutual Relief Society of America -- are also plaintiffs, as are a nun and a female missionary.
The rule was announced as part of the federal health care law -- and came under fire in February from religious groups that object to the use of contraceptives, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs. In response to the criticism, President Barack Obama's administration has said it would shift the requirement from the employers to health insurers themselves.
The lawsuit alleges that the rule will effectively force religious employers and organizations to drop health insurance coverage, which will raise enrollment in state Medicaid programs and increase patient numbers at state-subsidized hospitals and medical centers. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is named as a defendant.
In court papers, Justice Department lawyers said the groups have failed to show that they face the immediate threat of having to offer the coverage. They said delaying the enforcement provides a "safe harbor" for concerned religious groups while the rules are being changed, and the department will grandfather in many existing coverage plans.
Published: Thu, May 3, 2012
headlines Detroit
- Lawsuits between prediction markets and states now spans nearly half of U.S.
- Supreme Court reform gathers momentum
- Narrow Mail-in Voting Ruling by Supreme Court Doesn’t Address Constitutionality of Trump’s Executive Order
- ABA joins NASS and to mobilize lawyers as poll workers for midterm elections
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Legal writers can benefit from a Zen writing approach and some Hemingway—and so can their readers
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Why the next competitive advantage in the AI era is partnership, not just technology
- Things I wish my spouse had told me before they died
- Troutman Pepper Locke associate files discrimination lawsuit against firm
- Jay-Z’s extortion suit against lawyer in withdrawn rape case faces skepticism from judge




