- Posted July 24, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court of Appeals rejects challenge to clean air rule
By Pete Yost
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal appeals court has rejected a challenge to a tough new clean air requirement limiting sulfur dioxide emissions.
The Environmental Protection Agency regulation is designed to prevent people with asthma from exposure to short-term bursts of sulfur dioxide. Several corporations and industrial associations along with several states argued the new level is lower than required by law to protect public health.
In a 3-0 decision, the court said the Clean Air Act gives EPA significant discretion to revise air quality standards and that the EPA did not act arbitrarily. The court said it cannot conclude that the new standard is unreasonable or unsupported by the record in the case.
The opinion was by Judge David Sentelle, joined by Judges Brett Kavanaugh and Douglas Ginsburg, all appointed by Republican presidents.
Published: Tue, Jul 24, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Judge’s memorial unveiled
- Commissioners approve funding to support $27.7 million in local Oakland County road projects
- Judge to lead community-based behavioral health workshop
- ABA President Michelle A. Behnke calls Equity Summit 2026 ‘a step towards action’
- Michigan Human Trafficking Commission launches quarterly newsletter
headlines National
- 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
- Federal judge who had in-chambers sex with top police officer issues clerks revised apology letters
- Criminal defense lawyer arrested, faces multiple charges after viral video of road rage confrontation
- Immigration lawyers continue to fight scammers
- Supreme Court spares Alabama man from nitrogen gas execution
- Lawyer convicted of orchestrating drug deals wins back law license




