NEW YORK (AP) — Defending himself Tuesday against a lawsuit, former New York Gov. George Pataki described a creepy stranger who joined a family hike nearly two decades ago as a major catalyst in his crusade to institutionalize violent sexual predators.
Pataki told about the episode in Hudson Highlands State Park near his Peekskill birthplace as he explained to a federal jury in Manhattan why he became interested in ridding the streets of violent sex offenders soon after he became governor in 1995.
The 68-year-old Pataki is a defendant in a civil lawsuit filed by six convicted sex offenders who said their constitutional rights were violated when a Pataki-initiated program in 2005 caused them to be transferred indefinitely to psychiatric centers when their prison terms ended. A state court ruled a year later that the program was illegal, but the men remained institutionalized for years.
The three-term Republican governor said he was hiking with his wife, a son and several neighborhood children in 1995 or 1996 when he noticed a stranger was constantly near them and would “walk right out and stand next to the kids.”
He telephoned state police troopers on security detail nearby and they learned he had been convicted of sexual crimes in the Rochester area.
Pataki said he tried unsuccessfully for years to get the state legislature to pass a law that would let violent sexual predators be evaluated for possible involuntary institutionalization at the end of their prison terms. He said a Democratic assemblyman and a prosecutor were among those in 2005 who suggested it could be done under existing law.
He said he was determined to develop the program after a newly paroled rapist killed a woman in 2005 in a suburban mall parking lot and then told investigators that he was angry he had to register as a sex offender and was not getting mental health treatment from Westchester County that he thought he deserved.
Repeatedly, Pataki testified he began the program that put more than 100 convicted prisoners into psychiatric institutions only after he was advised existing law allowed it.
U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff told jurors the initiative was unconstitutional and they must determine whether the defendants acted with intent to deprive the plaintiffs of constitutional rights.
- Posted July 25, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Ex-governor testifies at sex-offender trial
headlines Detroit
- Michigan Supreme Court conducts public administrative hearing Nov. 18
- Community ties Attorney displays passion for serving the public
- Voting right advocates highlight safeguards in place to protect Michigan elections before and after ballots are cast on November 3
- The GOP wants to revamp the Supreme Court. It’ll be tough.
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Cider Man: Chicago lawyer reclaims his heritage with cidery in upstate New York
- Did ‘corporate speak’ and PowerPoint lead to complacency at GM?
- Voting is a right and a responsibility, ABA President Barbara J. Howard says
- Ex-state deputy attorney general accused of making AI-generated child porn
- New murder trial ordered over juror’s mental health crisis in 9th Circuit
- ABA 2026 Celebration of Pro Bono to focus on ‘Serving Justice. Strengthening Democracy’




