PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A panel of federal judges expressed skepticism Tuesday about the American Civil Liberties Unions’ contention that the FBI must make public more details about what census data it uses in its investigations in New Jersey.
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia is the second federal appeals court to take up the issue on whether the Department of Justice was right to deny portions of Freedom of Information Act requests filed in 2011 when the ACLU asked the 34 FBI field offices nationwide to detail what “public source” racial and ethnic data they use.
The ACLU says it has learned from the information it has received that the government has investigated groups such as African-Americans in Georgia, Arabs in Michigan and Latin Americans in New Jersey.
The ACLU contends that such “suspicionless” investigations are illegal and that the government is keeping secrets that it shouldn’t. Though the FBI did hand over more than 200 pages of documents, the civil liberties group says it needs more complete information to know which communities could be targeted in New Jersey.
In tough questioning Tuesday of ACLU lawyer Nusrat Choudhury, the panel of judges asked about the ACLU’s intentions since it was asking for data already in the public domain.
“You don’t want the public information,” Judge D. Brooks Smith said. “You want to know what they’re doing with it.”
The ACLU is also suing over information denials in California.
- Posted September 11, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
DOJ, ACLU in court over NJ documents
headlines Detroit
headlines National
- Legal writers can benefit from a Zen writing approach and some Hemingway—and so can their readers
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Why the next competitive advantage in the AI era is partnership, not just technology
- Things I wish my spouse had told me before they died
- Troutman Pepper Locke associate files discrimination lawsuit against firm
- Jay-Z’s extortion suit against lawyer in withdrawn rape case faces skepticism from judge




