––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted April 02, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Healthy Debate
Wayne State Law School presented “Originalism v. Living Constitutionalism: The Debate” on Thursday, March 27. It featured Professor Lee J. Strang of the University of Toledo Law School offering the Originalist view and Wayne Law’s own Professor Robert A. Sedler with the Living Constitution viewpoint. Both are acknowledged experts on constitutional issues. “Originalism, from the 10,000 foot level, is the idea that the publicly understood meaning of the Constitution’s text, when it was ratified, is its authoritative meaning,” Strang told the audience. Sedler argued that our understanding and interpretation of the Constitution must evolve as time passes, saying that, for example, “The ‘value’ that is constitutionalized in the text of the 14th Amendment is the value of equality. The meaning of equality changes with the time and the meaning of ‘equal protection’ changes with it.”
Photo by Steve Thorpe
headlines Detroit
headlines National
- Legal writers can benefit from a Zen writing approach and some Hemingway—and so can their readers
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Why the next competitive advantage in the AI era is partnership, not just technology
- Things I wish my spouse had told me before they died
- Troutman Pepper Locke associate files discrimination lawsuit against firm
- Jay-Z’s extortion suit against lawyer in withdrawn rape case faces skepticism from judge




