- Posted November 04, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court Notebook
@ROUND UP Briefs Headline:High court rejects appeal over Senate filibuster rules
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from a public interest group and four members of Congress who challenged the Senate filibuster as unconstitutional.
The justices let stand a lower court ruling that said Common Cause and the lawmakers did not have legal standing to pursue the case.
The plaintiffs argued that Senate rules requiring at least 60 votes to bring legislation to a vote violates the constitutional principle of majority rule. A federal appeals court said the lawsuit was filed against the wrong parties.
The case was brought against Vice President Joe Biden in his role as president of the Senate, and against the Senate's secretary, parliamentarian and sergeant at arms.
Common Cause says it can't sue the Senate directly because that is barred under the Constitution's Speech and Debate Clause.
Last year, the Senate voted to end use of the filibuster rule from blocking most presidential nominees. Democrats said they ended the rule out of frustration that Republicans were routinely using the tactic to block President Barack Obama's nominees for pivotal judgeships and other top jobs.
But 60 votes are still required to end filibusters against legislation.
@ROUND UP Briefs Headline:Supreme Court rejects Argentina's appeal of $185 million award
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court has rejected Argentina's appeal of a British natural gas company's multimillion dollar award against the government.
The justices on Monday let stand without comment an arbitration tribunal's award of $185 million to BG Group in a dispute with Argentina over a natural gas development.
It was the second time the high court has considered the case. Earlier this year, the justices reversed the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., which had thrown out the award.
In the latest appeal, Argentina argued that the tribunal disregarded the law in reaching its decision. But same federal appeals court ruled against Argentina.
The case is Argentina v. BG Group, 14-211.
Published: Tue, Nov 04, 2014
headlines Detroit
- Michigan Law faculty research into AI and the law earns awards
- Nessel roundtable discusses MEDC shortfalls, Whitmer pressure on legislative action
- A series of close calls afforded him a greater purpose
- Detroit’s High Property Taxes are Driving a Housing Affordability Crisis — How Can City Leaders Bring Cost Down?
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Play-Based Learning: Can simulation games help lawyers learn management and business development skills?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Court orders hospital to resume gender-affirming care for transgender kids
- Netflix’s ‘The Lincoln Lawyer’ will rest his case at end of season 5
- Woman gives birth during arraignment in NYC courtroom
- SCOTUS will examine scope of Title IX protections and whether civil rights law covers work bias claims




