COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Evidence that corroborates a crime has no bearing on the sentence an offender should receive, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled Wednesday as it tossed out part of an Ohio sex assault law.
The court’s 6-1 ruling, which addressed sex assaults on children under 13, also rejected corroborating evidence as a sentencing tool in plea deals where a jury did not consider the evidence.
Corroborating evidence is irrelevant to the purpose of sentencing, namely “protecting the public from future crime and punishing the offender,” Justice Judith Lanzinger wrote for the majority.
Lawmakers have “unconstitutionally created two different sanctions to be imposed on offenders who commit the same crime — differentiated only by the quantity of the evidence presented to prove guilt,” Lanzinger said.
Prosecutors argued unsuccessfully that lawmakers have wide discretion in defining crimes and fixing punishments.
The decision overturned a three-year prison sentence for gross sexual imposition handed down to a Franklin County man.
- Posted February 13, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Sentencing aspect tossed in sex assault law
headlines Macomb
- New leadership team takes helm at State Bar
- Four weeks before Election Day, mail ballot returns are up 30% over same point in 2022
- Belleville woman arraigned in connection with alleged arson, felonious assault
- Warren man pleads No Contest to Felonious Assault and dog stabbing
- Woman sentenced for mortgage fraud, filing a false $374,000 tax refund return
headlines National
- Melissa Hart, the chair of the ABA Legal Ed council, dies
- Judge suspended after indictment over alleged perjury
- Bill Withers’ music publisher files copyright suit over Olivia Dean’s ‘I’ve Seen It’
- Judge reinstates US attorney in Washington fired by Trump
- Interim law dean of University of Florida named to permanent role
- Clio acquires Learned Hand, an AI company for courts, judges
