CARLISLE, Pa. (AP) — A central Pennsylvania man has been charged after police say he sprayed fluid used to embalm a human brain on marijuana that he then smoked.
State police in Carlisle charged 26-year-old Joshua Lee Long with abuse of a corpse and conspiracy.
Court records indicate Long’s aunt contacted detectives on June 21 after finding a human brain in a department store bag under a porch while cleaning out a trailer.
Long allegedly told her during a phone conversation from the Cumberland County jail that he used the formaldehyde-soaked pot to get high.
“The defendant related that he knew it was illegal to have the brain and that he and (another man) would spray the embalming fluid on ‘weed’ to get high,” wrote Trooper John Boardman, the investigator.
Court records indicate a coroner concluded the brain was real and that Long supposedly named it Freddy.
The coroners who examined the brain believe it was most likely a stolen teaching specimen, according to the arrest affidavit.
- Posted July 18, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Police: Man used brain preserving fluid to soak weed
headlines Macomb
- Scholarship recipients celebrated
- Eastpointe man sentenced for assault with intent to do great bodily harm in two cases
- Michigan gang member pleads guilty to RICO conspiracy for drug trafficking and over $500,000 in fraud
- Attorney general, senator want to see movement on social media, AI safety bills for minors
- Justice Dept., FTC extend deadline for public comment on guidance on business collaborations
headlines National
- Millions of Americans continue to lack meaningful access to justice. What can be done about it?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Federal judge hands down $110K penalty against 2 lawyers for AI errors in court documents
- Former adult film actress passes February bar exam in Texas
- Grad sues George Washington University, Ernst & Young after Gaza ‘genocide’ remarks in commencement speech
- Magicians Penn & Teller file Supreme Court brief questioning use of ‘investigative hypnosis’




