- Posted December 26, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
ABA issues guidance for nonpayment issues
The American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has issued Formal Opinion 476 that addresses confidentiality issues that arise when a lawyer moves to withdraw from a civil case because of a client's failure to pay legal fees.
The opinion recommends a process for the lawyer and the trial judge when the lawyer seeks to withdraw from civil litigation because of fee issues and how much, if any, confidential client information the lawyer should disclose in filing a motion to withdraw. Since sticky situations can arise, "this requires cooperation between lawyers and judges."
In a lawyer's request to withdraw as counsel in a civil proceeding based on a client's failure to pay, at least two ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct come into play. A lawyer has a duty of confidentiality under Rule 1.6. That rule must be reconciled with the court's need for sufficient information upon which to rule on motions made consistent with Rule 1.16, which deals with declining or terminating representation.
Under the guidance in Formal Opinion 476, a lawyer who has a good faith basis for withdrawal under subsections of Rule 1.16 should first submit a motion providing no confidential client information apart from a reference to "professional considerations" or the like.
"Upon being informed by the court that further information is necessary, respond, when practicable, by seeking to persuade the court to rule on the motion without requiring the disclosure of confidential client information, asserting all non-frivolous claims of confidentiality and privilege," Formal Opinion 476 said in its guidance to attorneys.
If that approach fails, the opinion suggests that the lawyer "submit only such information as is reasonably necessary to satisfy the needs of the court and preferably by whatever restricted means of submission, such as in camera review under seal, or such other procedures designated to minimize disclosure as the court determines is appropriate."
Formal Opinion 476 is available on the ABA Center for Professional Responsibility website.
Published: Mon, Dec 26, 2016
headlines Jackson County
- Michigan Law’s Child Welfare Appellate Clinic marks a significant win on housing at State Court of Appeals
- U-M engineering grad eyes a career in patent law
- ABA: Lawyer’s duties should not mislead when acting as a third-party mediator
- New State Bar ethics opinion offers stipulations for judicial officers
- ‘JAEPC Meeting’
headlines National
- Nikole Nelson champions a national model to bring legal services to those without access
- Social media and your legal career
- OJ Simpson estate accepts $58M claim by father of Ron Goldman, killed along with Nicole Brown Simpson
- Law prof who called for military action and end to Israel sues over teaching suspension
- The advantages of using an AI agent in contract review
- Courthouse rock, political talk lead to potential suspension for Elvis-loving judge




