LANSING, Mich. (AP) — The outgoing chief justice of Michigan’s Supreme Court is pushing to move the state’s jury duty system to one that eases wait times.
Michigan’s jury process is “extraordinarily stupid,” as people often get called for jury duty only to sit around in a courthouse before being sent home, Chief Justice Robert Young Jr. told the Detroit Free Press.
Young said jury duty is an important obligation for U.S. citizens and that the court shouldn’t burden them by wasting their time.
“This is all about our efforts to become more service-focused,” he added.
Under Young’s proposal, prospective jurors would have appointments with the court and could be notified on their smartphones about when they are and are not needed.
He cited management of the juror-selection process as an example of how technology can help make the courts more efficient and user-friendly, while in many cases, saving a significant amount of money.
The challenge of the project would be funding, since Michigan courts are individually funded through 165 local funding units, said Young.
Young’s term as the court’s chief justice is set to end in early January, although he’ll remain on the seven-member bench.
- Posted December 28, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Justice Young wants to reform jury duty system
headlines Detroit
- Zearfoss to deliver Michigan Law commencement address ahead of planned retirement
- War with Iran fails to produce a ‘win’ that U.S and Israel were blindly seeking
- From conferences to certificates, MSU’s Indigenous Law and Policy Center leads the future of Tribal Law
- Business Law Seminar featuring 10 judges slated May 7 in Troy
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill




