The Associated Press
Flexible spending accounts that set aside pre-tax wages for health care costs will have a cap in 2013 that workers need to keep in mind as they plan for next year.
Benefits-related open enrollment periods, the lone chance employees generally have each year to set up these accounts, are winding down for many companies. Starting in 2013,
employees will be able to set aside no more than $2,500 in the accounts, which can be used to pay for a wide range of medical expenses not covered by insurance.
This limit doesn't count the contributions a worker's company may make to the account in addition to what the employee sets aside, said Jody L. Dietel, chief compliance officer with WageWorks Inc., a San Mateo, Calif., company that administers flexible spending accounts, or FSAs, for about 1.5 million people.
FSAs can lower a participant's taxable income, but they come with the condition that the employee must spend the money before the end of the year or it is forfeited.
The government previously didn't limit how much workers could set aside, but most companies capped contributions at around $5,000. The new limit was set as part of the health care overhaul, the massive law that aims to provide coverage for millions of uninsured people.
The limit may affect people who are planning for some big medical expenses in the coming year like a surgery or braces for children. FSAs also can be used to pay for things like alternative medicines like acupuncture and transportation expenses for a medical visit.
Employees of many companies also can set aside money in pre-tax accounts to cover the cost of child care or adult day care. The contribution limit for these dependent care savings accounts remains at $5,000. Dietel said that cap hasn't changed for years.
- Posted November 16, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Limit debuts in 2013 for employee health accounts
headlines Detroit
- Lawsuits between prediction markets and states now spans nearly half of U.S.
- Supreme Court reform gathers momentum
- Narrow Mail-in Voting Ruling by Supreme Court Doesn’t Address Constitutionality of Trump’s Executive Order
- ABA joins NASS and to mobilize lawyers as poll workers for midterm elections
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Legal writers can benefit from a Zen writing approach and some Hemingway—and so can their readers
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Why the next competitive advantage in the AI era is partnership, not just technology
- Things I wish my spouse had told me before they died
- Troutman Pepper Locke associate files discrimination lawsuit against firm
- Jay-Z’s extortion suit against lawyer in withdrawn rape case faces skepticism from judge




