TRAVERSE CITY (AP) — A city-owned utility in Traverse City can't be held responsible for the death of a tree trimmer who had contact with a power line.
The Michigan Supreme Court turned down an appeal Wednesday from Zachary Adams' family, which means a Court of Appeals decision in favor of the utility will stand.
Adams was employed by a contractor to trim trees for Traverse City Light and Power when he was killed in 2013. His estate filed a lawsuit with several theories of liability.
The utility is an arm of local government, which is generally immune to tort lawsuits. But the estate claimed that an exception under Michigan law applied, arguing that the utility was in business to make money for Traverse City.
The appeals court acknowledged that revenue in recent years had exceeded expenses but said that's not enough to invoke the exception.
"The primary purpose of defendant's activities is not pecuniary profit. To find otherwise would be to penalize sound and responsible financial decisions by a municipal utility," the appeals court said in 2020.
- Posted June 02, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Justices reject appeal in tree trimmer's death
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- ABA amicus brief supports noncitizens’ right to a bond hearing when detention becomes ‘unreasonably prolonged’
- Nessel secures full victory in lawsuit challenging administration’s attack on fair housing protections
- Whitmer announces new automotive jobs, investment in Oakland County
- AG pushes federal government to strengthen rules to combat illegal robocalls
headlines National
- ABA Legal Ed council repeals DEI standard
- Is Perry Mason TV’s most effective lawyer? New study names top 5
- Lawyer who cited paraphrasing as direct quotes in 2nd Circuit brief says AI played a role
- After jury deadlock and mistrial, Lindsay Clancy could face second trial
- Murder, Corruption and RICO in Georgia: Fateful meeting I didn’t want to attend led to courtroom win
- Bad Bunny, Justin Bieber among musical stars facing copyright suit for using reggaeton’s signature beat




