California
Juvenile detention officers staged ‘gladiator fights’ between youth, indictment says
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Thirty officers at a Southern California juvenile detention facility have been charged for their role in facilitating so-called “gladiator fights” between youth in their care, the state’s attorney general said Monday.
A grand jury indictment alleges the officers at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall in Los Angeles County allowed and sometimes encouraged nearly 70 fights to take place between July 2023 and December 2023. More than 140 victims between the ages of 12 and 18 were involved.
“We believe that this was planned, it was intended,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said. “They often wanted them to happen at the beginning of the day, in a certain time, in a certain place, a space and a time was created for the fights, and the plan was for the fights to happen.”
The officers face charges including child endangerment and abuse, conspiracy, and battery.
Twenty-two of the officers were scheduled to be arraigned Monday at the Los Angeles County Superior Court.
The investigation began after the Los Angeles Times first obtained and published footage that shows a 17-year-old being attacked by at least six other young people, who come at him one-by-one as officers stand by watching. Some officers appear to laugh and shake hands with the participants in the beating.
The video was first made public during a court hearing during which the 17-year-old’s public defender argued to a judge that he was not safe at Los Padrinos and should be released ahead of his trial.
The indictment singles out two probation officers who allegedly told staff members ahead of time that fights would occur and “they were not to say anything, write down anything, and just watch.” It also alleges one of the officers told youths involved to “refuse treatment when they went to medical to get treated by nurses.”
The LA County Probation Department, which runs the facility, said in a statement that it “fully supports and applauds” the attorney general’s office for Monday’s indictments, and that all officers involved are on leave without pay.
“Our department sought the assistance of law enforcement authorities when misconduct was discovered,” the statement said. “Since then, we have fully collaborated with our law enforcement partners. ... Accountability is a cornerstone of our mission, and we have zero tolerance for misconduct of any peace officers, especially those dealing with young people in our system.”
Jamal Tooson, who represents the 17-year-old and his family in a civil case against the county, called Monday’s indictment the “the tip of the iceberg” of a systemic problem in the probation department.
There’s a “culture that promotes a lack of accountability, violence and policies that encourage officers to look the other way as evident in the video,” Tooson said. “The reaction of the children who were eating their lunch, they really didn’t seem shocked or surprised, which tells me this is a daily occurrence.”
Tooson represents several other families with children harmed at Los Padrinos, including one who was left with a traumatic brain injury after being knocked unconscious in a classroom, he said.
Texas
iHeartMedia says legal dispute with Drake was settled because it ‘did nothing wrong’
HOUSTON (AP) — Texas-based iHeartMedia said it settled its legal dispute with Drake over Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us” after demonstrating that it “did nothing wrong.”
Drake had alleged in a legal petition filed in November that iHeartMedia received illegal payments from Universal Music Group to boost radio airplay for “Not Like Us.” UMG is the parent record label for both Drake and Lamar.
San Antonio-based iHeartMedia initially declined to comment on the settlement that was revealed last week in court documents. The media company released an updated statement Monday.
“In exchange for documents that showed iHeart did nothing wrong, Drake agreed to drop his petition. No payments were made -- by either one of us,” the statement said.
In a court document filed Thursday in Bexar County, where San Antonio is located, attorneys for Drake said the rapper and iHeartMedia had “reached an amicable resolution of the dispute” but did not offer any other information.
A hearing on a motion by UMG’s lawyers to dismiss Drake’s petition is scheduled for Wednesday.
Drake’s petition also alleges UMG knew “the song itself, as well as its accompanying album art and music video, attacked the character of another one of UMG’s most prominent artists, Drake, by falsely accusing him of being a sex offender.”
The feud between Drake, a 38-year-old Canadian rapper and singer and five-time Grammy winner, and Lamar, a 37-year-old Pulitzer Prize winner who headlined the Super Bowl halftime show on Feb. 9, is among the biggest in hip-hop in recent years.
Colorado
DOJ is reviewing prosecution of clerk who supported Trump’s election lies
DENVER (AP) — The Department of Justice is backing a former county election clerk in Colorado who was convicted for her role in allowing supporters of President Donald Trump to access confidential data about the 2020 election, the latest move by the administration to use its power to reward allies who violated the law on the president’s behalf.
Acting U.S. Assistant Attorney General Yaakov M. Roth submitted a filing in federal court in Colorado this week supporting a request from former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, who’s asking a federal court to free her from jail while she appeals her state conviction for the 2021 election security breach. Roth wrote that “reasonable concerns” have been raised about Peters’ prosecution and that it was among others nationally that the government was reviewing for “abuses of the criminal justice process.”
Peters has become a celebrity in the world of those who embrace Trump’s lies that he lost the 2020 election due to fraud. Her supporters have been pushing the new Republican administration to
pressure Colorado’s Democratic governor, Jared Polis, to pardon her.
The intervention by Trump’s Justice Department in the Peters case marks a new stage in the administration’s effort to use the federal government to promote the president’s political interests. By getting involved in a state-level prosecution, in a case filed by an elected Republican prosecutor in Colorado, the Justice Department is taking an even more unusual step than it has in previously supporting the president’s agenda.
Previously, Trump pardoned more than a thousand people convicted in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. He named an attorney for some of those defendants, Ed Martin, to be acting U.S. attorney in the District of Columbia. Martin has since threatened to investigate Democratic politicians and others who criticize the Trump administration’s cost-cutting efforts. The Department of Justice also moved to drop corruption charges against New York’s Democratic mayor, Eric Adams, contending that they, too, were tainted by “weaponization” and that the administration needed Adams’ cooperation in its immigration enforcement efforts.
“The Trump Department of Justice’s decision to review Tina Peters’ conviction for attempting to compromise her own election equipment shows that the Trump administration is trying to rewrite history and normalize fake election conspiracies,” said Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat who is the state’s top election official. “Shame on them for weaponizing the legal system to push their election lies.”
The breach of election systems in Mesa County allowed sensitive information about the county’s voting system, which is used in counties across the country, to be posted online. Experts have described the breach as serious, saying it could provide a “practice environment” that would allow anyone to probe for vulnerabilities that could be exploited during a future election.
At sentencing, District Judge Matthew Barrett had harsh words for Peters: “You are no hero. You abused your position, and you’re a charlatan.”
Peters, 69, was sentenced to nine years. She has argued that she had a duty to preserve election data before the voting system was upgraded and that she should not be prosecuted for carrying out her job. Earlier this year, she filed a last-ditch appeal in federal court asking a judge to order her released on bail while her appeal is pending. Her attorneys noted she is being monitored for a recurrence of lung cancer and say she has lost weight and has experienced memory problems while she’s incarcerated.
On Tuesday, Peters was still being held in Larimer County jail, 60 miles (about 95 kilometers) north of Denver. She is serving a six-month sentence for a misdemeanor before she will be transferred to a state prison to serve a sentence of more than eight years in the voting machine case, according to the federal court filing.
An attorney for Peters, John Case, had no immediate comment on Tuesday.
In the federal government’s filing in the case, made Monday, Roth said Peters had received an “exceptionally lengthy sentence imposed relative to the conduct at issue” and urged the federal judge to consider Peters’ request to be released pending her court appeals.
In explaining why the Justice Department was reviewing Peters’ case, Roth said the agency planned to evaluate whether the state prosecution was “oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives.”
The case was prosecuted by District Attorney Daniel P. Rubinstein, a Republican who has served in that role since 2015. An email and a phone call seeking comment from Rubinstein were not immediately returned.
Lawrence Norden, an election security expert at the Brennan Center for Justice, said the case against Peters was “an open and shut case of official misconduct.”
“The statements from the Department of Justice, coming after the administration has dismantled a number of federal guardrails to protect the integrity of our elections, sends a terrible message to election officials and the broader community about where the administration stands on election security,” Norden said.
Trump’s administration has taken several steps to weaken election security since returning to power. In recent weeks, the Department of Homeland Security has paused all election-related work and placed on leave at least 17 staffers who have worked on election security at the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency pending a review. It was also ending its involvement in a voluntary program that shared information with and provided cybersecurity resources to state and local election officials.
Juvenile detention officers staged ‘gladiator fights’ between youth, indictment says
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Thirty officers at a Southern California juvenile detention facility have been charged for their role in facilitating so-called “gladiator fights” between youth in their care, the state’s attorney general said Monday.
A grand jury indictment alleges the officers at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall in Los Angeles County allowed and sometimes encouraged nearly 70 fights to take place between July 2023 and December 2023. More than 140 victims between the ages of 12 and 18 were involved.
“We believe that this was planned, it was intended,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said. “They often wanted them to happen at the beginning of the day, in a certain time, in a certain place, a space and a time was created for the fights, and the plan was for the fights to happen.”
The officers face charges including child endangerment and abuse, conspiracy, and battery.
Twenty-two of the officers were scheduled to be arraigned Monday at the Los Angeles County Superior Court.
The investigation began after the Los Angeles Times first obtained and published footage that shows a 17-year-old being attacked by at least six other young people, who come at him one-by-one as officers stand by watching. Some officers appear to laugh and shake hands with the participants in the beating.
The video was first made public during a court hearing during which the 17-year-old’s public defender argued to a judge that he was not safe at Los Padrinos and should be released ahead of his trial.
The indictment singles out two probation officers who allegedly told staff members ahead of time that fights would occur and “they were not to say anything, write down anything, and just watch.” It also alleges one of the officers told youths involved to “refuse treatment when they went to medical to get treated by nurses.”
The LA County Probation Department, which runs the facility, said in a statement that it “fully supports and applauds” the attorney general’s office for Monday’s indictments, and that all officers involved are on leave without pay.
“Our department sought the assistance of law enforcement authorities when misconduct was discovered,” the statement said. “Since then, we have fully collaborated with our law enforcement partners. ... Accountability is a cornerstone of our mission, and we have zero tolerance for misconduct of any peace officers, especially those dealing with young people in our system.”
Jamal Tooson, who represents the 17-year-old and his family in a civil case against the county, called Monday’s indictment the “the tip of the iceberg” of a systemic problem in the probation department.
There’s a “culture that promotes a lack of accountability, violence and policies that encourage officers to look the other way as evident in the video,” Tooson said. “The reaction of the children who were eating their lunch, they really didn’t seem shocked or surprised, which tells me this is a daily occurrence.”
Tooson represents several other families with children harmed at Los Padrinos, including one who was left with a traumatic brain injury after being knocked unconscious in a classroom, he said.
Texas
iHeartMedia says legal dispute with Drake was settled because it ‘did nothing wrong’
HOUSTON (AP) — Texas-based iHeartMedia said it settled its legal dispute with Drake over Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us” after demonstrating that it “did nothing wrong.”
Drake had alleged in a legal petition filed in November that iHeartMedia received illegal payments from Universal Music Group to boost radio airplay for “Not Like Us.” UMG is the parent record label for both Drake and Lamar.
San Antonio-based iHeartMedia initially declined to comment on the settlement that was revealed last week in court documents. The media company released an updated statement Monday.
“In exchange for documents that showed iHeart did nothing wrong, Drake agreed to drop his petition. No payments were made -- by either one of us,” the statement said.
In a court document filed Thursday in Bexar County, where San Antonio is located, attorneys for Drake said the rapper and iHeartMedia had “reached an amicable resolution of the dispute” but did not offer any other information.
A hearing on a motion by UMG’s lawyers to dismiss Drake’s petition is scheduled for Wednesday.
Drake’s petition also alleges UMG knew “the song itself, as well as its accompanying album art and music video, attacked the character of another one of UMG’s most prominent artists, Drake, by falsely accusing him of being a sex offender.”
The feud between Drake, a 38-year-old Canadian rapper and singer and five-time Grammy winner, and Lamar, a 37-year-old Pulitzer Prize winner who headlined the Super Bowl halftime show on Feb. 9, is among the biggest in hip-hop in recent years.
Colorado
DOJ is reviewing prosecution of clerk who supported Trump’s election lies
DENVER (AP) — The Department of Justice is backing a former county election clerk in Colorado who was convicted for her role in allowing supporters of President Donald Trump to access confidential data about the 2020 election, the latest move by the administration to use its power to reward allies who violated the law on the president’s behalf.
Acting U.S. Assistant Attorney General Yaakov M. Roth submitted a filing in federal court in Colorado this week supporting a request from former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, who’s asking a federal court to free her from jail while she appeals her state conviction for the 2021 election security breach. Roth wrote that “reasonable concerns” have been raised about Peters’ prosecution and that it was among others nationally that the government was reviewing for “abuses of the criminal justice process.”
Peters has become a celebrity in the world of those who embrace Trump’s lies that he lost the 2020 election due to fraud. Her supporters have been pushing the new Republican administration to
pressure Colorado’s Democratic governor, Jared Polis, to pardon her.
The intervention by Trump’s Justice Department in the Peters case marks a new stage in the administration’s effort to use the federal government to promote the president’s political interests. By getting involved in a state-level prosecution, in a case filed by an elected Republican prosecutor in Colorado, the Justice Department is taking an even more unusual step than it has in previously supporting the president’s agenda.
Previously, Trump pardoned more than a thousand people convicted in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. He named an attorney for some of those defendants, Ed Martin, to be acting U.S. attorney in the District of Columbia. Martin has since threatened to investigate Democratic politicians and others who criticize the Trump administration’s cost-cutting efforts. The Department of Justice also moved to drop corruption charges against New York’s Democratic mayor, Eric Adams, contending that they, too, were tainted by “weaponization” and that the administration needed Adams’ cooperation in its immigration enforcement efforts.
“The Trump Department of Justice’s decision to review Tina Peters’ conviction for attempting to compromise her own election equipment shows that the Trump administration is trying to rewrite history and normalize fake election conspiracies,” said Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat who is the state’s top election official. “Shame on them for weaponizing the legal system to push their election lies.”
The breach of election systems in Mesa County allowed sensitive information about the county’s voting system, which is used in counties across the country, to be posted online. Experts have described the breach as serious, saying it could provide a “practice environment” that would allow anyone to probe for vulnerabilities that could be exploited during a future election.
At sentencing, District Judge Matthew Barrett had harsh words for Peters: “You are no hero. You abused your position, and you’re a charlatan.”
Peters, 69, was sentenced to nine years. She has argued that she had a duty to preserve election data before the voting system was upgraded and that she should not be prosecuted for carrying out her job. Earlier this year, she filed a last-ditch appeal in federal court asking a judge to order her released on bail while her appeal is pending. Her attorneys noted she is being monitored for a recurrence of lung cancer and say she has lost weight and has experienced memory problems while she’s incarcerated.
On Tuesday, Peters was still being held in Larimer County jail, 60 miles (about 95 kilometers) north of Denver. She is serving a six-month sentence for a misdemeanor before she will be transferred to a state prison to serve a sentence of more than eight years in the voting machine case, according to the federal court filing.
An attorney for Peters, John Case, had no immediate comment on Tuesday.
In the federal government’s filing in the case, made Monday, Roth said Peters had received an “exceptionally lengthy sentence imposed relative to the conduct at issue” and urged the federal judge to consider Peters’ request to be released pending her court appeals.
In explaining why the Justice Department was reviewing Peters’ case, Roth said the agency planned to evaluate whether the state prosecution was “oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives.”
The case was prosecuted by District Attorney Daniel P. Rubinstein, a Republican who has served in that role since 2015. An email and a phone call seeking comment from Rubinstein were not immediately returned.
Lawrence Norden, an election security expert at the Brennan Center for Justice, said the case against Peters was “an open and shut case of official misconduct.”
“The statements from the Department of Justice, coming after the administration has dismantled a number of federal guardrails to protect the integrity of our elections, sends a terrible message to election officials and the broader community about where the administration stands on election security,” Norden said.
Trump’s administration has taken several steps to weaken election security since returning to power. In recent weeks, the Department of Homeland Security has paused all election-related work and placed on leave at least 17 staffers who have worked on election security at the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency pending a review. It was also ending its involvement in a voluntary program that shared information with and provided cybersecurity resources to state and local election officials.
